Improving walking via real-time visual feedback after stroke in treadmill training (RE-VISIT): a protocol for randomized controlled trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2024.e5459Keywords:
Stroke, Gait Training, Visual Feedback, Treadmill, Walking Speed, BalanceAbstract
BACKGROUND: After a stroke, most patients often suffer reduced walking ability and balance. Restoring walking ability and improving balance are major goals of stroke rehabilitation. Treadmills are often used in clinical setups to achieve these goals. Adding dimensions to the visual feedback in addition to the mirror for real-time frontal view is proven to enhance the gait. It is, therefore, important to design additional real-time visual feedback in treadmill training, in particular for the sagittal view involved side. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to test if the real-time sagittal visual feedback during treadmill training is superior to the conventional mirror feedback treadmill training program of equivalent intensity in improving walking speed and balance after stroke. METHODS/DESIGN: The RE-VISIT trial (Real-time Visual feedback after Stroke in Treadmill training) is registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2023/10/058299). In this two-arm randomized control trial, which will be a single-blinded study, 42 eligible stroke survivors undergoing rehabilitation will be randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to either real-time visual sagittal feedback along with front mirror (experimental) group or only front mirror treadmill training (control) group, all the participants will receive 15 sessions of treadmill training for up to 15 min at a safe self-selected speed over 5-6 weeks. The RE-VISIT (experimental) group will receive real-time, visual sagittal view feedback of the involved lower limb trajectory along with the routine front mirror view during treadmill training and will be asked to modify their gait pattern. The control group will receive treadmill walking training only with the routine front mirror view feedback. Clinical and gait assessments will be conducted at the baseline, immediately following the final session of training, and at the 9th week during follow-up. The outcome measures of interest are walking speed (primary) and balance (secondary), which will be measured prior to baseline, post 15 sessions of training, and at the 9th week following training. DISCUSSION: This REVISIT trial will provide insight and contribute to the existing innovation and modifications of incorporating real-time visual feedback during treadmill training in post-stroke gait rehabilitation. The findings will help the better designing of a gait rehabilitation program with a treadmill for post-stroke subjects to improve walking speed, and balance for those who have greater difficulties in community ambulation. We anticipate that those in the REVISIT training will demonstrate improved walking ability.
Downloads
References
(1) Jones SP, Baqai K, Clegg A, Georgiou R, Harris C, Holland EJ, et al. Stroke in India: A systematic review of the incidence, prevalence, and case fatality. Int J Stroke. 2021;17(2):132-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930211027834
(2) Baqai K, Hackett M, Holland EJ, Patel K, Lightbody CE, Georgiou R, et al. Stroke in India: a systematic review of the burden (incidence, prevalence) outcome including case fatality [Internet]. PROSPERO – International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. 2021. Available from: https://clok.uclan.ac.uk/39646/?template=default_internal
(3) GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1223-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30752-2
(4) Polese JC, Ada L, Dean CM, Nascimento LR, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Treadmill training is effective for ambulatory adults with stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2013;59(2):73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1836-9553(13)70159-0
(5) Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M, Elsner B. Electromechanical‐assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5(5):CD006185. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006185.pub4
(6) Li RQ, Li ZM, Tan JY, Chen GL, Lin WY. Effects of motor imagery on walking function and balance in patients after stroke: a quantitative synthesis of randomized controlled trials. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2017;28:75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.05.009
(7) Coenen P, Werven G, Nunen MPM, Dieën JH, Gerrits KHL, Janssen TWJ. Robot-assisted walking vs overground walking in stroke patients: an evaluation of muscle activity. Journal Of Rehabil Med. 2012;44(4):331-7. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0954
(8) Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Exercise on a treadmill or walking outdoors? A randomized controlled trial comparing effectiveness of two walking exercise programmes late after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(1):46-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215509343328
(9) Bishnoi A, Lee R, Hu Y, Mahoney JR, Hernandez ME. Effect of Treadmill Training Interventions on Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Older Adults with Neurological Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(5):2824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052824
(10) Schröder J, Truijen S, Criekinge T, Saeys W. Feasibility and effectiveness of repetitive gait training early after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabiln Med. 2019;51(2):78-88. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2505
(11) Drużbicki M, Przysada G, Guzik A, Brzozowska-Magoń A, Kołodziej K, Wolan-Nieroda A, et al. The efficacy of gait training using a body weight support treadmill and visual biofeedback in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized controlled trial. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018:3812602. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3812602
(12) Gama GL, Celestino ML, Barela JA, Forrester L, Whitall J, Barela AM. Effects of gait training with body weight support on a treadmill versus overground in individuals with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(4):738-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.022
(13) Ada L, Dean CM, Lindley R. Randomized trial of treadmill training to improve walking in community‐dwelling people after stroke: the AMBULATE trial. Int J Stroke. 2013;8(6):436-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00934.x
(14) Park GY, Lee SH, Kim JY. Analysis of the Treadmill Utilization for the Development of a Virtual Reality Walking Interface. Int J Control Autom. 2018;11(2):161-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijca.2018.11.2.14
(15) Bennett JA. The consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT): Guidelines for reporting randomized trials. Nurs Res. 2005;54(2):128-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200503000-00007
(16) Rao MVV, Juneja A, Maulik M, Adhikari T, Sharma S, Gupta J, et al. Emerging trends from COVID-19 research registered in the Clinical Trials Registry–India. Indian J Med Res. 2021;153(1–2):26-63. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2556_20
(17) Kim N, Lee B, Kim Y, Min W. Effects of virtual reality treadmill training on community balance confidence and gait in people post-stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Exp Stroke Transl Med [Internet]. 2016;9(1):1-7. Available from: https://www.openaccessjournals.com/articles/effects-of-virtual-reality-treadmill-training-on-community-balance-confidence-and-gait-in-people-poststroke-arandomized-controlled-11899.html
(18) Kang H. Sample size determination for repeated measures design using G Power software. Anesth Pain Med. 2015;10(1):6-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.17085/apm.2015.10.1.6
(19) Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Walking speed over 10 metres overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15(4):415-21. https://doi.org/10.1191/026921501678310216
(20) Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the berg balance scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88(5):559-66. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20070205
(21) Thayaparan AJ, Mahdi E. The patient satisfaction questionnaire short form (PSQ-18) as an adaptable, reliable, and validated tool for use in various settings. Med Educ Online. 2013;18:21747. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.21747
(22) Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200-7. https://doi.org/10.7326%2F0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Balamurugan Janakiraman, Parthasarathy Ranganathan, Hariharasudhan Ravichandran, Kshama Susheel Shetty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.