Initial development and content validation of a comprehensive physical, psychosocial and skill related fitness scale in school going children

Authors

  • Kanu Goyal Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation (Mullana). Haryana, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6500-4403
  • Subhasish Chatterjee Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation (Mullana). Haryana, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8919-8820

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2026.e6605

Keywords:

Physical Fitness, Psychosocial Factors, Health, Child, Schools, Validation Study, Motor Skills, Surveys and Questionnaires, Delphi Technique

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Physical, psychosocial and skill-related fitness are the essential factors of overall fitness in children. Developing these components of fitness is crucial for overall health, well-being, and athletic potential. There are several scales to evaluate children's physical fitness. Also, psychosocial assessment scales are available for school-going children. To date, no scale is available to measure the combined physical, psychosocial and skill-related fitness in school-going children. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to generate items and domains related to physical, psychosocial and skill-related fitness in children and to validate the content by experts. METHODS: Items were generated through a reproducible, extensive literature search conducted between January 1990 and February 2025 across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and PEDro using predefined Boolean search combinations. All complete search strings and dates have been documented for transparency. 16 studies contributed to item extraction following eligibility screening. The Delphi process was conducted in two structured rounds with domain-specific expert panels (n=8, including paediatricians, sports physiotherapists, paediatric physiotherapists, psychologists and psychiatrists with ≥10 years of experience). Item-level content validity index (I-CVI≥ 0.78) and scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave ≥ 0.90) were predefined as acceptance criteria. Primary outcome: achievement of acceptable I-CVI and S-CVI thresholds. Secondary outcome: quantitative refinement of items and domain structure. RESULTS: From 3300 identified records, 16 studies contributed to item extraction, 19 items were derived from literature and 12 from expert input (total = 31 items). After, two Delphi rounds 16 items were retained under physical skill domains (S-CVI=1) and 15 under psychosocial domain (S-CVI = 0.90) CONCLUSION: The comprehensive scale addressing physical, psychosocial and skill related fitness in school going children under the proposed domains, have been developed and content validated. These items are recommended for their use in the assessment of physical, psychosocial and skill related fitness in children.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Utesch T, Dreiskämper D, Strauss B, Naul R. The development of the physical fitness construct across childhood. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28(1):212-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12889

2. Ruedl G, Niedermeier M, Wimmer L, Ploner V, Pocecco E, Cocca A, et al. Impact of parental education and physical activity on the long-term development of the physical fitness of primary school children: An observational study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8736. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168736

3. Ke D, Maimaitijiang R, Shen S, Kishi H, Kurokawa Y, Suzuki K. Field-based physical fitness assessment in preschool children: A scoping review. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:939442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.939442

4. Zhao R, Li X, Wang J, Zhang L, Gao Z. Evaluation of physical fitness and health of young children aged between 3 and 6 based on cluster and factor analyses. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):420. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17660-5

5. Pate RR, Daniels S. Institute of Medicine report on fitness measures and health outcomes in youth. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(3):221-2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1464

6. Ruiz JR, Castro-Piñero J, España-Romero V, Artero EG, Ortega FB, Cuenca MM, et al. Field-based fitness assessment in young people: The ALPHA health-related fitness test battery for children and adolescents. Brit J Sport Med. 2010;45:518–24. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2010.075341

7. Popović R, Aleksić A, Stojanović D, Stefanović M, Božić S, Popović M. Evaluation of the physical fitness level in physical education female students using “eurofit-test”. Int J Sports Sci Phys Educ. 2017;2(1):1-5. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170201.11

8. Eastham SL. Physical fitness test administration practices and students’ cognitive understanding of physical fitness. The Physical Educator. 2018;75(3):374-93. https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2018-V75-I3-7933

9. Marques A, Henriques-Neto D, Peralta M, Martins J, Gomes F, Popovic S, et al. Field-based health-related physical fitness tests in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:640028. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.640028

10. Kowalski KC, Crocker PR, Donen RM. The physical activity questionnaire for older children (PAQ-C) and adolescents (PAQ-A) manual. College of kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan [Internet]. 2004;87(1):1–38. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20130524222640id_/http://www.dapa-toolkit.mrc.ac.uk/documents/en/PAQ/PAQ_manual.pdf

11. Nieman P. Psychosocial aspects of physical activity. Pediatr child health. 2002;7(5):309-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/7.5.309

12. Livingstone MBE, Robson PJ, Wallace JMW, McKinley MC. How active are we? Levels of routine physical activity in children and adults. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003;62(3):681-701. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2003291

13. Sugimoto D, Stracciolini A, Berbert L, Nohelty E, Kobelski GP, Parmeter B, et al. Assessment of physical tests in 6–11 years old children: Findings from the Play Lifestyle and Activity in Youth (PLAY) study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(3):2552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032552

14. Sopa IS, Pomohaci M. Study regarding the development of agility skills of students aged between 10 and 12 years old. Timişoara Physical Education and Rehabilitation Journal [Internet]. 2016;9(17):7-16. Available from: https://scispace.com/pdf/study-regarding-the-development-of-agility-skills-of-x9ivhp8kqd.pdf

15. Shah S, Diwan S. Assessment of Physical Fitness among School Children Aged between 11 and 14 Years in Surat City: A Cross-sectional Evaluation. Indian Journal of Medical Specialities. 2024;15(3):169-74. https://doi.org/10.4103/injms.injms_179_23

16. Kupfersmid J. Freud's Clinical Theories Then and Now. Psychodyn Psychiatry. 2019;47(1):81-97. https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2019.47.1.81

17. Gautam S, Jain A, Chaudhary J, Gautam M, Gaur M, Grover S. Concept of mental health and mental well-being, it's determinants and coping strategies. Indian J Psychiatry. 2024;66(Suppl2):S231-44. https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_707_23

18. Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in medicine journal. 2019;11(2):49-54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6

19. Aksah H, Ani AIC, Johar S, Husain SH. Evaluating the Content Validity: Development of An Instrument for Measuring Functional Building Performance. International Journal of Global Optimization and Its Application. 2023;2(1):12-19. https://doi.org/10.56225/ijgoia.v2i1.161

20. Said NAM, Bujang SM, Buang NA, Siraj@Ramli HH, Besar MNA. Critical thinking transfer practice instrument: a content validity calculation steps based on expert panel evaluation. Education in Medicine Journal. 2022;14(3):61–74. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2022.14.3.5

21. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

22. Yubin Y, Dev RDO, Geok SK, XueYan J. Enhancing exercise adherence through self-efficacy: mechanisms, moderators, and interventions. Int J Acad Res Bus Social Sci. 2025;15(3):1713-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v15-i3/25122

23. Reisberg K, Riso EM, Jürimäe J. Physical Fitness in Children during Growth: Associations with Body Composition, Physical Activity, and Cognitive Skills. In: Souza AA, Bezerra TA, Souza-Filha A, Silva SS. Updates on Physical Fitness in Children. London: IntechOpen; 2023. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003787

24. Korcz A, Bojkowski Ł, Bronikowski M, Łopatka M, Khorkova M, Koszałka-Silska A, et al. Cluster analysis of physical activity and physical fitness and their associations with components of school skills in children aged 8–9 years. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):5053. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88359-9

25. LaCaille R, Marshall E. Psychosocial benefits and aspects of physical activity. In: Gellman MD. Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. Switzerland: Springer Cham; 2020. p. 1786-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39903-0_1617

26. Zhang G, Feng W, Zhao L, Zhao X, Li T. The association between physical activity, self-efficacy, stress self-management and mental health among adolescents. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):5488. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56149-4

27. Camerini AL, Schulz PJ. Social desirability bias in child-report social well-being: Evaluation of the children’s social desirability short scale using item response theory and examination of its impact on self-report family and peer relationships. Child Ind Res. 2018;11(4):1159-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9472-9

Published

05/25/2026

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Goyal K, Chatterjee S. Initial development and content validation of a comprehensive physical, psychosocial and skill related fitness scale in school going children. Rev Pesq Fisio [Internet]. 2026 May 25 [cited 2026 May 29];16:e6605. Available from: https://www5.bahiana.edu.br/index.php/fisioterapia/article/view/6605