Quality of life in people with spinal cord injuries in Tunja-Colombia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2025.e6272

Keywords:

Quality of Life, Protective Factors, Risk Factors, Spinal Cord Injuries, Cross-Sectional Studies

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a pathological condition that affects a person's performance in areas such as personal, social, economic, etc. In addition, it causes physical and functional changes that affect independence and functionality, which has an impact on quality of life (QoL). OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors associated with QoL in people with SCI in Boyacá - Colombia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional design with a sample of 87 subjects selected using the snowball technique, for whom the WHOQOL-BREF test was used to assess QoL. The analysis was performed using descriptive statistics for the sociodemographic variables and, in the bivariate case, Pearson's chi-square test was used. In the multivariate case, negative binomial regression was used with the enter method, considering the theoretical and statistically significant variables. RESULTS: The mean age was 47.7 ± 14.4 years, with a predominance of men (69% - n = 60); QoL was good in 74.7% (n = 65) with a 95% CI (35.58%-83.85%). Protective factors included being male (OR = 0.366, 95% CI [0.167-0.802]), marital status, having company (OR = 0.324, 95% CI [0.131-0.800]), and risk factors: educational level (PR= 5.052, 95% CI [1.095-23.319]), low socioeconomic status (PR= 3.315, 95% CI [1.080-10.177]), and having a high disability (PR= 3.145, 95% CI [1.144-8.649]). CONCLUSIONS: QoL, which is composed of different dimensions, is related to structural social determinants such as gender, socioeconomic status, educational level, and income, in addition to clinical determinants such as etiology and injury level.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Organización Mundial de la Salud. ¿Qué calidad de vida? Foro Mundial de la Salud [Internet]. 1996;17:385-7. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/c9b6ae1c-107e-4b41-b4c7-cdf76afb1451/content

2. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Spinal cord injury [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/spinal-cord-injury

3. Lopera-Vásquez JP. Health-related quality of life: Exclusion of subjectivity. Cien Saude Colet. 2020;25(2):693-702. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020252.16382017

4. Goulet J, Richard-Denis A, Thompson C, Mac-Thiong JM. Relationships between specific functional abilities and health-related quality of life in chronic traumatic spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;98(1):14-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001006

5. Richard-Denis A, Benazet D, Thompson C, Mac-Thiong JM. Determining priorities in functional rehabilitation related to quality of life one-year following a traumatic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020;43(2):241-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2018.1517138

6. Halvorsen A, Pape K, Post MWM, Biering-Sørensen F, Mikalsen S, Hansen AN, et al. Participation and quality of life in persons living with spinal cord injury in Norway. J Rehabil Med 2021;53:jrm00217. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2858

7. Geyh S, Ballert C, Sinnott A, Charlifue S, Catz A, Greve JMD, et al. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a comparison across six countries. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(4):322-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.128

8. Nizeyimana E, Joseph C, Phillips J. Quality of life after traumatic spinal cord injury in a developing context: the influence of contextual factors and injury characteristics. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(10):2020-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1827051

9. Chang F, Xie H, Zhang Q, Sun M, Yang Y, Chen G, et al. Quality of life of adults with chronic spinal cord injury in Mainland China: a cross-sectional study. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52:jrm00058. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2689

10. Angulo SM, Reales JM, Sandín B, Santed MA. Quality of life in people with spinal cord injury. Rev Psicopatol Psicol Clin. 2019;24(2):71-82. https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.23114

11. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Boletín técnico: Personas certificadas con discapacidad [Internet]. Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social; 2024. Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/PES/boletin-personas-certificadas-discapacidad-primer-semestre-2024.pdf

12. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social (Colombia). Análisis de la situación de salud con el modelo de los determinantes sociales de salud, municipio de Tunja Boyacá 2021 [Internet]. Boyacá: Secretaría de Salud; 2021. Available from: https://www.boyaca.gov.co/SecSalud/images/Documentos/asis2021/asis_tunja_2021.pdf

13. Organización Mundial de la Salud, Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, la Discapacidad y la Salud (CIF) [Internet]. WHO/PAHO; 2001. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/43360/9241545445_spa.pdf

14. Mashola MK, & Mothabeng DJ. Associations between health behaviour, secondary health conditions and quality of life in people with spinal cord injury. Afr J Disabil. 2019;8:a463. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.463

15. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE) . Estratificación Socioeconómica [Internet]. Available from: https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/sistema-estadistico-nacional-sen/normas-y-estandares/lineamientos?view=article&id=468:estratificacion-socioeconomica&catid=69

16. Roberts TT, Leonard GR, Cepela DJ. Classifications In Brief: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(5):1499-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5133-4

17. Spanish-Colombian WHOQOL-BREF [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available from: https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol/whoqol-bref/docs/default-source/publishing-policies/whoqol-bref/spanish-colombian-whoqol-bref

18. World Health Organization. WHOQOL: User manual [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2012. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/4c5cd94a-599e-450f-9141-4a21a7b74849/content

19. Organización Mundial de la Salud. WHOQOL: Calidad de vida [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; n.d. Available from: http://envejecimiento.csic.es/documentos/documentos/oms-calidad-01.pdf

20. World Health Organization. WHO – Quality of Life – Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) [Internet]. NovoPsych; n.d. Available from: https://novopsych.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/WHOQOL-BREF-questionnaire.pdf

21. Formato cuestionarios SOC- 13 y WHOQOL- Bref. Universidad de Zaragoza [Internet]. n.d. Available from: https://zaguan.unizar.es/record/11708/files/TAZ-TFM-2013-617_ANE.pdf

22. Huerta JAL. Comparison of Quality of Life Components in Transit Migrants, Caregivers of Cancer Patients and Pregrade Students Using the WHOQOL-BREF. Caleidoscopio. 2020;24(43). https://doi.org/10.33064/43crscsh2115

23. Soto PAB, Pérez CL. Design and Validation of a Body Image Questionnaire for Physically Disabled Persons. Rev Colomb Psicol. 2015;24(1):219-33. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v24n1.45644

24. Üstün TB, Kostanjesek N, Chatterji S, Rehm J. Measuring health and disability: Manual for WHO disability assessment schedule WHODAS 2.0 [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2010. [cited 2024 June 23]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/measuring-health-and-disability-manual-for-who-disability-assessment-schedule-(-whodas-2.0)

25. Zarco-Periñan MJ, Barrera-Chacón MJ, García-Obrero I, Mendez-Ferrer JB, Alarcon LE, Vargas CER. Development of the Spanish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III: cross-cultural adaptation and reliability and validity study. Disabil rehabil. 2014;36(19):1644-51. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.864713

26. Anshu A, Sundaravadhanan S. Quality of Life in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective Longitudinal Study. Indian Journal of Neurotrauma. 2023;20(01):18-23. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725570

27. Gándara-Sambade T, Fernández-Pereira M, Rodríguez-Sotillo A. Sistemas robotizados para la reeducación de la marcha en la lesión medular: una revisión sistemática. Rev neurol. 2017;64(5):205-13. https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.6405.2016200

28. Laxe S, Borda D. La rehabilitación en la mujer con lesión medular: una reflexión para el 8 de marzo. Rev neurol. 2024;78(5):119-20. https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7805.2024051

29. Kumar N, Gupta B. Effect of spinal cord injury on quality of life of affected soldiers in India: a cross-sectional study. Asian spine journal. 2016;10(2):267-75. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.267

30. Miguel-Rubio A, Rascón-Maíz J, Alba-Rueda Á, Rodrigues-de-Souza DP. Driving improvement in spinal cord injury patients using virtual reality. Systematic review. Rev neurol. 2022;75(2):31-40. https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7502.2022091

Published

12/15/2025

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Cobo-Mejía EA, Castellanos-Vega R del P, Monsalve-Jaramillo E, Quino-Avila AC, Ibáñez-Pinilla EA, Rubio-Barreto CM. Quality of life in people with spinal cord injuries in Tunja-Colombia. Rev Pesq Fisio [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 15 [cited 2025 Dec. 16];15:e6272. Available from: https://www5.bahiana.edu.br/index.php/fisioterapia/article/view/6272