[Erratum] Effect of remote ischemic pre-conditioning on maximum oxygen consumption and maximum power in runners and cyclists: systematic review and metanalysis

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Remote ischemic preconditioning (PIRC) is a non-invasive cardioprotective intervention that attenuates cell damage suffered by prolonged ischemia. Its protective effects on the heart, when applied to sport, can improve exercise performance. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) and maximum power (Wmax) in runners and cyclists. METHODOLOGY: Systematic review and meta-analysis, with randomized clinical trials. Based on PRISMA and evaluated by the PROSPERO systematic review project repository; however, it did not obtain registration because it is an outcome of sports performance. The searches were carried out in the Medline / PubMed, SciELO, Capes Periodicals databases. The selection of studies was carried out in two stages: reading the title and summary and reading the articles in full. Data extraction was performed by transcribing the information. Methodological quality was assessed by the risk of bias scale using the Cochrane tool. Studies that investigated variables other than the outcomes selected for this review were excluded. RESULTS: Eight clinical trials were included. In the generation of the item of random sequence, concealment of allocation and blinding of outcome evaluators in almost all studies had a high risk of bias. The analysis of the risk of bias was high risk. The results of the meta-analysis did not show significant differences in VO2max and Wmax. CONCLUSION: Remote ischemic preconditioning was not effective in increasing VO2max and Wmax in runners and cyclists.