Fatores psicossociais associados à percepção de saúde de professores universitários em home office no Brasil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2025.e6147Palavras-chave:
Docentes, Trabalho Remoto, Fatores Psicossociais, Pandemia, Estudos TransversaisResumo
INTRODUÇÃO: Professores universitários têm enfrentado mudanças na metodologia de ensino desde a pandemia de COVID-19, as quais exigiram uma adaptação emergencial ao ensino remoto. A permanência de atividades remotas após a pandemia se tornou parte da rotina, no entanto o impacto destas na saúde mental destes trabalhadores é desconhecido. OBJETIVO: Identificar os fatores associados à percepção de saúde dos professores universitários durante a pandemia. MÉTODOS: Este estudo transversal coletou dados de junho a setembro de 2020 de 207 professores universitários. Os dados foram obtidos por formulário eletrônico, com questões sociodemográficas e ocupacionais, além da versão curta do Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ II-Br). Análise estatística descritiva e análise de regressão logística para o desfecho percepção geral de saúde foram realizadas no SPSS. RESULTADOS: Ruído em home office (OR=4,20; 95%IC=1,87-9,43); número de medicamentos em uso (OR=1,52; 95%IC=1,12-2,07); sintomas de burnout (OR=1,48; 95%IC=1,17-1,87) e índice de massa corporal (OR=1,10; 95%IC=1,01-1,21) aumentaram a chance dos professores reportarem percepção de saúde ruim. CONCLUSÃO: Durante a adaptação ao ensino remoto emergencial, os professores universitários enfrentaram diversos riscos psicossociais e fatores foram associados à sua percepção geral de saúde. Nesse contexto, a atuação fisioterapêutica na saúde do trabalhador, incluindo o manejo de fatores psicossociais relacionados ao trabalho, poderia mitigar os riscos psicossociais em situações similares. Investigações futuras com estratégias multidisciplinares, incluindo intervenções ergonômicas, são necessárias para um ambiente de trabalho mais saudável no ensino remoto.
Downloads
Referências
1. Crepaldi TOM, Carvalhais JDJ. The contribution of bad sleeping quality on professors' work life: a review. Braz J of Develop. 2020;6(10):75044-57. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n10-070
2. Chen Z. Influence of working from home during the Covid-19 crisis and her practitioner response. Front Psychol. 2021;710517. Cited: PMID: 34630219
3. Kotowski SE, Davis KG, Barratt CL. Teachers Feeling the Burden of COVID-19: Impact on Well-Being, Stress, and Burnout. Work. 2022;71(2):407–15. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210994
4. Kayabınar E, Kayabınar B, Önal B, Zengin HY, Köse N. The musculoskeletal problems and psychosocial status of teachers giving online education during the COVID-19 pandemic and preventive telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal problems. Work. 2021;68(1):33-43. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203357
5. Araripe FAAL, Nascimento RV, Pantoja LDM, Paixão GC. Aspectos ergonômicos e distanciamento social enfrentados por docentes de graduação a distância durante a pandemia. Rev Docência Ens Sup. 202;10:e024713. https://doi.org/10.35699/2237-5864.2020.24713
6. Santiago ISD, Santos EP, Silva JA, Cavalcante YS, Gonçalves Júnior J, Costa ARS, et al. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental Health of Teachers and Its Possible Risk Factors: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(3):1747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031747
7. Andrade MA, Castro CSM, Batistão MV, Mininel VA, Sato TO. Occupational Profile, Psychosocial Aspects, and Work Ability of Brazilian Workers During COVID-19 Pandemic: IMPPAC Cohort. Saf Health Work. 2022;13(1):104-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2021.11.004
8. Matos RC, Mendes GMM, Nascimento MMG, Reis AMM, Gomes MA, Mota APL, et al. Health perception and satisfaction with emergency remote teaching teachers in the Covid-19 pandemic. REAS. 2023;23(4):e11918. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e11918.2023
9. Zhang YL, Wu BJ, Chen P, Guo Y. The self-rated health status and key influencing factors in middle-aged and elderly: evidence from the CHARLS. Medicine. 2021;100(46):e27772. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027772
10. Shan S, Cao J, Tang K, Cheng S, Ren Z, Li S, et al. Self-rated health, interviewer-rated health, and objective health status as predictors of mortality among Chinese older adults: a national longitudinal study. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1137527. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1137527
11. Barbosa Neto L, Christofoletti G, Alencar GP, Burke TN. Burnout syndrome, work ability, quality of life and physical activity in teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Campo Grande, Brazil. WORK. 2023;78(1):45-53. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-220187
12. Prall J, Ross M. The management of work-related musculoskeletal injuries in an occupational health setting: the role of the physical therapist. J Exerc Rehabil. 2019;15(2):193-9. https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.1836636.318
13. Morgado FFR, Vale WS, Lopes CS, Maranhão Neto GA, Lattari E, Mediano MFF, et al. Psychosocial determinants of physical activity among workers: an integrative review. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2020;18(4):472-87. https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2020-575
14. Bordado SM, Bayattork M, Andersen LL, Schlünssen V. Psychosocial effects of workplace exercise - A systematic review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019;45(6):533-45. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3832
15. Malta M, Cardoso LO, Bastos FI, Magnanini MMM, Silva CMFP. STROBE initiative: guidelines on reporting observational studies. Rev Saude Publica. 2010;44(3):559-65. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102010000300021
16. Resolução nº 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012 (Brazil). Aprova as seguintes diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União. Available from: https://www.gov.br/conselho-nacional-de-saude/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/atos-normativos/resolucoes/2012/resolucao-no-466.pdf
17. Gonçalves JS, Moriguchi CS, Chaves TC, Sato TO. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the short version of COPSOQ II-Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2021;55:69. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003123
18. Kristensen TS. Vejledning til brugere af AMI's korte spørgeskema om psykisk arbejdsmiljø. Copenhagen: Arbejdsmiljøinstituttet; 2000. Available from: https://nfa.elsevierpure.com/da/publications/vejledning-til-brugere-af-amis-korte-sp%C3%B8rgeskema-om-psykisk-arbej/
19. Agresti A, Finlay B. Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2018.
20. Matias AB, Falcão MTC, Grosseman S, Germani ACCG, Silva ATC. The COVID-19 pandemic and teachers’ work: perceptions of teachers from a public university in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2023;28(2):537-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232023282.11972022
21. Smith PM, Oudyk J, Cedillo L, Inouye K, Potter G, Mustard C. Perceived Adequacy of Infection Control Practices and Symptoms of Anxiety Among In-Person Elementary School Educators in Ontario. J Occup Environ Med. 2022;64(11):e763-e768. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002693
22. McKee H, Gohar B, Appleby R, Nowrouzi-Kia B, Hagen BNM, Jones-Bitton A. High Psychosocial Work Demands, Decreased Well-Being, and Perceived Well-Being Needs Within Veterinary Academia During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:746716. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.746716
23. Silva CCM, Santos AB, Leoci IC, Leite EG, Antunes EP, Torres W, et al. The Association between Perceived Stress, Quality of Life, and Level of Physical Activity in Public School Teachers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024;21(1):88. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21010088
24. Lopes-Pereira AP, Grego-Maia L, Santos SVM, Cruz-Robazzi MLC, Silva LA. Predictors associated with the quality of life at work of public university teachers. Rev Salud Publica. 2020;22(5):544-51 https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v22n5.75923
25. Lizana PA, Vega-Fernadez G. Teacher Teleworking during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Association between Work Hours, Work–Family Balance and Quality of Life. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18(14):7566. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147566
26. Oliveira Filho A, Netto-Oliveira ER, Oliveira AAB. Quality of life and risk factors of university professors. Rev Educ Fis/UEM. 2012;23(1):57-67. https://doi.org/10.4025/reveducfis.v23i1.10468
27. Puglisi E, Blasio S, Shtrepi L, Astolfi A. Remote working in the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a questionnaire on the perceived noise annoyance. Front Built Environ. 2021;7:688484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.688484
28. Pinho PS, Freitas AMC, Cardoso MCB, Silva JS, Reis LF, Muniz CFD, et al. Remote teaching work and health: repercussions of new requirements in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Trab educ saúde. 2021;19:e00325157. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-7746-sol00325
29. Ramos JGM, Pérez MSP, LLaguento FAM, Navarro ER. Burnout and anxiety levels in human medicine teachers, COVID-19 context. F1000Res. 2022;11:491. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.110498.1
30. Ozamiz-Etxebarria N, Fernandez IL, Lipnicki DM, Mondragon NI, Santabárbara J. Prevalence of burnout among teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(6):4866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064866
31. Silva NSSE, Cabral BRE, Leão LL, Pena GG, Pinho L, Magalhães TA, et al. Working conditions, lifestyle and mental health of Brazilian public-school teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatriki. 2021;32(4):282-9. https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2021.045
32. Kalimeri K, Beiró MG, Bonanomi A, Rosina A, Cattuto C. Traditional versus Facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information. Dem Res. 2020;42(5):133–48. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2020.42.5
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Amanda Pratavieira Tanan, Marcela Alves Andrade, Maria Isabel Triches, Tatiana de Oliveira Sato
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Esta obra está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
