Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and medical misinformation: lessons to be learned from the COVID-19 infodemic

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17267/2675-021Xevidence.2024.e5444

Keywords:

Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Medical Misinformation, COVID-19

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a multifactorial condition for which there is no known aetiology. The lack of evidence base surrounding the aetiology of IBS coupled with the variety of management tools employed by affected patients has meant that the condition has been an increased topic of interest amongst “patient influencers”. While there is a notable value to such influencers on social media in terms of peer-to-peer support and fostering discussions of lived experiences with an affected community, concerns remain over the quality and accuracy of information being shared. Medical misinformation poses a new global health threat; medical professionals remain powerless to filter through what has been dubbed by some as “misinformation mayhem”. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed significant gaps in health literacy and a lack of trust in the medical and political systems that were responsible for communicating health information. This literature review outlines the missed opportunities for counteracting medical misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic and identifies the ways in which these lessons could be applied to future communication and interaction with IBS (mis)information within the social media sphere.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Drossman DA. Functional gastrointestinal disorders: history, pathophysiology, clinical features, and Rome IV. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(6):1262-79. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.032

(2) Sun S, Chen J, Li H, Lou Y, Chen L, Lv B. Patients’ perspectives on irritable bowel syndrome: a qualitative analysis based on social media in China. Qual Life Res. 2023;32(9):2561-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03417-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03417-x

(3) Javed A, Beg S, Woods A. PWE-65 Who’s influencing your #IBS patients?. Gut. 2021;70(suppl 4):A176-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-BSG.327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-BSG.327

(4) Willis E, Friedel K, Heisten M, Pickett M, Bhowmick A. Communicating health literacy on prescription medications on social media: in-depth interviews with “patient influencers”. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e41867. https://doi.org/10.2196/41867 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/41867

(5) Flier JS, Loscalzo J. Categorizing biomedical research: the basics of translation. FASEB J. 2017;31(8):3210-5. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201700303R DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201700303R

(6) Alvarez-Galvez J, Salinas-Perez JA, Montagni I, Salvador-Carulla L. The persistence of digital divides in the use of health information: a comparative study in 28 European countries. Int J Public Health. 2020;65(3):325-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01363-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01363-w

(7) Bas-Sarmiento P, Lamas-Toranzo MJ, Fernández-Gutiérrez M, Poza-Méndez M. Health Literacy, Misinformation, Self-Perceived Risk and Fear, and Preventive Measures Related to COVID-19 in Spanish University Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(22):15370. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215370

(8) Soroya SH, Farooq A, Mahmood K, Isoaho J, Zara S-E. From information seeking to information avoidance: Understanding the health information behavior during a global health crisis. Inf Process Manag. 2021;58(2):102440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102440

(9) Jia X, Pang Y, Liu LS. Online health information seeking behavior: a systematic review. Healthcare. 2021;9(12):1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121740

(10) Neely S, Eldredge C, Sanders R. Health information seeking behaviors on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic among American social networking site users: survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(6):e29802. https://doi.org/10.2196/29802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/29802

(11) Mian A, Khan S. Coronavirus: the spread of misinformation. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3

(12) Lalani HS, DiResta R, Baron RJ, Scales D. Addressing Viral Medical Rumors and False or Misleading Information. Ann Intern Med. 2023;176(8):1113-20. https://doi.org/10.7326/m23-1218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M23-1218

(13) Eghtesadi M, Florea A. Facebook, Instagram, Reddit and TikTok: a proposal for health authorities to integrate popular social media platforms in contingency planning amid a global pandemic outbreak. Can J Public Health. 2020;111(3):389-91. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-020-00343-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-020-00343-0

(14) Allington D, Duffy B, Wessely S, Dhavan N, Rubin J. Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychol Med. 2021;51(10):1763-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003329172000224x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172000224X

(15) Stevens H, Palomares NA. Constituents’ inferences of local governments’ goals and the relationship between political party and belief in COVID-19 misinformation: cross-sectional survey of Twitter followers of state public health departments. JMIR Infodemiology. 2022;2(1):e29246. https://doi.org/10.2196/29246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/29246

(16) Leng Y, Zhai Y, Sun S, Wu Y, Selzer J, Strover S, et al. Misinformation during the COVID-19 outbreak in China: cultural, social and political entanglements. IEEE Trans Big Data. 2021;7(1):69-80. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbdata.2021.3055758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2021.3055758

(17) Valenzuela S, Halpern D, Katz JE, Miranda JP. The paradox of participation versus misinformation: social media, political engagement, and the spread of misinformation. Digit Journal. 2019;7(6):802-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623701

(18) Hilton DJ. A literature review on COVID-19 [coronavirus] research specific to Australia including manuscripts on policy and media releases. J Évid-Based Healthc. 2022;4:e3846. https://doi.org/10.17267/2675-021Xevidence.2022.e3846 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17267/2675-021Xevidence.2022.e3846

(19) Teplinsky E, Ponce SB, Drake EK, Garcia AM, Loeb S, Londen GJ, et al. Online medical misinformation in cancer: distinguishing fact from fiction. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022;18(8):584-9. https://doi.org/10.1200/op.21.00764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.21.00764

(20) Zhao Y, Zhang J. Consumer health information seeking in social media: a literature review. Health Info Libr J. 2017;34(4):268-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12192

(21) Okan O, Messer M, Levin-Zamir D, Paakkari L, Sørensen K. Health literacy as a social vaccine in the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Promot Int. 2023;38(4):daab197. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab197

(22) Mamak K. Do we need the criminalization of medical fake news?. Med Health Care Philos. 2021;24(2):235-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09996-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09996-7

(23) Vese D. Governing fake news: The regulation of social media and the right to freedom of expression in the era of emergency. Eur J Risk Regul. 2022;13(3):477-513. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2021.48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2021.48

(24) Carrieri V, Madio L, Principe F. Vaccine hesitancy and (fake) news: Quasi‐experimental evidence from Italy. Health Econ. 2019;28(11):1377-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3937

(25) Lopes LR, Campos JH, Chaves AFA. From SARS to COVID-19: lessons we should have learned (but we did not). J Évid-Based Healthc. 2021;3:e3837. https://doi.org/10.17267/2675-021Xevidence.2021.e3837 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17267/2675-021Xevidence.2021.e3837

(26) Franz B, Dhanani LY. Beyond political affiliation: an examination of the relationships between social factors and perceptions of and responses to COVID-19. J Behav Med. 44(5):641-52. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10865-021-00226-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-021-00226-w

(27) Stern EK, Brenner DM. Gut microbiota-based therapies for irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2018;9(2):e134. https://doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2018.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2018.2

(28) Leylabadlo HE, Heravi FS, Soltani E, Abbasi A, Kafil HS, Parsaei M, et al. The role of gut microbiota in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Reviews and Research in Medical Microbiology. 2022;33(1):e89-e104. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRM.0000000000000284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MRM.0000000000000284

(29) Mazzawi T. Gut microbiota manipulation in irritable bowel syndrome. Microorganisms. 2022;10(7):1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071332

(30) Falony G, Vandeputte D, Caenepeel C, Vieira-Silva S, Daryoush T, Vermeire S, et al. The human microbiome in health and disease: hype or hope. Acta Clin Belg. 2019;74(2):53-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2019.1583782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2019.1583782

(31) Van Oudenhove L, Levy RL, Crowell MD, Drossman DA, Halpert AD, Keefer L, Lackner JM, et al. Biopsychosocial aspects of functional gastrointestinal disorders: How central and environmental processes contribute to the development and expression of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(6):1355-67. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.027

(32) Francisconi CF, Sperber AD, Fang X, Fukudo S, Gerson MJ, Kang JY, et al. Multicultural aspects in functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). Gastroenterology. 2016;150(6):1344-54. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.013

(33) Marcon AR, Turvey S, Caulfield T. ‘Gut health’ and the microbiome in the popular press: a content analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e052446. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052446

(34) Zheng X, Fan X, Wright AP, Kim J, Zhao Y. 486 Social Media Use in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patient Education: A Content Analysis of YouTube Videos. AJG. 2019;114:S281-2. https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0000591476.97066.19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0000591476.97066.19

(35) Jafri FI, Ancha N, Roy A, Ahmad S, Riaz H, Hyman C. TikTok and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): a cross-sectional study of social media content quality. J Public Health. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-02062-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-02062-5

(36) Bergstrom CT. Eight rules to combat medical misinformation. Nat Med. 2022;28(12):2468. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02118-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02118-1

Downloads

Published

05/13/2024

Issue

Section

Bridging the gap

How to Cite

1.
Lees EM. Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and medical misinformation: lessons to be learned from the COVID-19 infodemic. Evidence [Internet]. 2024 May 13 [cited 2024 Dec. 3];6:e5444. Available from: https://www5.bahiana.edu.br/index.php/evidence/article/view/5444

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>