Data manipulation and fabrication in scientific research: are the consequences as simple as we think?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2023.e5230Keywords:
Scientific Misconduct, Ethics in Publication, Scientific FlawsAbstract
Scientific misconduct has been observed throughout the history of science. However, it has grown exponentially in recent decades, an example of which was the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. We reflect on the potential impact of weak evidence from a convincing practice or professional decision-making. This situation can occur due to educational system failures, training of researchers, and even moral and ethical deviations.
Downloads
References
(1) Office of Research Integrity. Case Sumaries [Internet]. Rockville: Department of Health and Human Services; [n.d.]. Available from: https://ori.hhs.gov/content/case_summary
(2) Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB. Delineando a pesquisa clínica: uma abordagem epidemiológica. 4th. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2015.
(3) Fiore M, Alfieri A, Pace M, Simeon V, Chiodini P, Leone S, et al. A scoping review of retracted publications in anesthesiology. Saudi J Anaesth. 2021;15(2):179-88. https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fsja.sja_1110_20
(4) Audisio K, Robinson NB, Soletti GJ, Cancelli G, Dimagli A, Spadaccio C, et al. A survey of retractions in the cardiovascular literature. Int J Cardiol. 2022;349:109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.12.021
(5) Schonhaut L, Costa-Roldan I, Oppenheimer I, Pizarro V, Han D, Díaz F. Scientific publication speed and retractions of COVID-19 pandemic original articles. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022;46:e25. https://doi.org/10.26633%2FRPSP.2022.25
(6) Khan H, Gupta P, Zimba O, Gupta L. Bibliometric and altmetric analysis of retracted articles on COVID-19. J Korean Med Sci. 2022;37(6):e44. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e44
(7) LaCroix T, Geil A, O’Connor C. The dynamics of retraction in epistemic networks. Philos Sci. 2021;88(3):415-38. https://doi.org/10.1086/712817
(8) Wager E, Barbour V, Yentis S, Kleinert S. Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Croat Med J. 2009;50(6):532-5. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2009.50.532
(9) Brumfiel G. Bell Labs launches inquiry into allegations of data duplication. Nature. 2002;417(6887):367-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/417367a
(10) Service RF. More of Bell Labs Physicist’s Papers Retracted. Science. 2003;299(5603):31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.299.5603.31b
(11) Shi Q, Wang Z, Zhou Q, Hou R, Gao X, He S, et al. More consideration is needed for retracted non-Cochrane systematic reviews in medicine: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;139:57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.020
(12) Pussegoda K, Turner L, Garritty C, Mayhew A, Skidmore B, Stevens A, et al. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0527-2
(13) ElSawi HA, Elborollosy A. Immune-mediated adverse events post-COVID vaccination and types of vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Egypt J Intern Med. 2022;34(1):44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-022-00129-5
(14) Gusenbauer M, Haddaway NR. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res Synth Methods. 2020;11(2):181-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
(15) Madeira AM. Professor demitido responsabiliza aluna por plágio [Internet]. Jornal do Campus. 2011 mar. 29. Available from: http://www.jornaldocampus.usp.br/index.php/2011/03/professor-demitido-responsabiliza-aluna-por-plagio/#:~:text=O%20professor%20da%20USP%2C%20Andreimar,ex%2Dreitora%20Suely%20Vilela)
(16) Bauchner H, Fontanarosa PB, Flanagin A, Thornton J. Scientific Misconduct and Medical Journals. JAMA. 2018;320(19):1985-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14350
(17) Volpato G. Ciência além da visibilidade: ciência, formação de cientistas e boas práticas. Botucatu: Best Writing; 2017.
(18) Moher D, Bouter L, Kleinert S, Glasziou P, Sham MH, Barbour V, et al. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(7):e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
(19) SciELO. Guia para o registro e publicação de Errata [Internet]. SciELO, 2020. Available from: https://wp.scielo.org/wp-content/uploads/guia_errata.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ciro Oliveira Queiroz, Camilo Luis Monteiro Lourenço
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
