The distinctions and the value of physician-scientists: a call for sustained support and nourishment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17267/2675-021Xevidence.2025.e5954Keywords:
Physician-Scientist, Medical Innovation, Global Health, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Research IncentivesAbstract
CONTEXT: Physician-scientists occupy a unique and critical position at the intersection of clinical practice and scientific research, yet they are becoming increasingly rare due to systemic challenges, including time constraints, financial disincentives, and insufficient institutional support. This article explores the conceptual and historical differences between physicians, researchers, scientists, and physician-scientists, highlighting their distinct contributions to global health, policy-making, and medical innovation. Historical examples, such as Robert Koch and Virchow Rudolf, exemplify the transformative impact of physician-scientists in advancing medicine. The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) presents new opportunities and challenges for these professionals, as AI can enhance their dual roles in research and patient care. CONCEPTUALIZATION: However, to sustain and grow the physician-scientist workforce, significant changes are needed, including better financial incentives, protected research time, and stronger mentorship programs. Without such support, the future of medical innovation and global health may be jeopardized. This article advocates for a renewed focus on cultivating physician-scientists, emphasizing their indispensable role in bridging the gap between bench and bedside, and ensuring that scientific discoveries translate into tangible improvements in human health and well-being.
Downloads
References
(1) Zimerman AL. Evidence-based medicine: a short history of a modern medical movement. Virtual Mentor. 2013;15(1):71-6. https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2013.15.1.mhst1-1301
(2) Ratnani I, Fatima S, Abid MM, Surani Z, Surani S. Evidence-Based Medicine: History, Review, Criticisms, and Pitfalls. Cureus. 2023;15(2):e35266. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35266
(3) Vyas JM, Armstrong KA. Physician-Scientist to Research-Engaged Physician-What Is in a Name? JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(9):e2433123. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33123
(4) Cianciolo AT, Mitzelfelt J, Ghareeb A, Zahid MF, Akbar R, Ghias K. Physician-scientist or basic scientist? Exploring the nature of clinicians' research engagement. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021;26(2):353-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-09988-5
(5) Conte ML, Liu J, Schnell S, Omary MB. Globalization and changing trends of biomedical research output. JCI Insight. 2017;2(12):e95206. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.95206
(6) Fontelo P, Liu F. A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0819-1
(7) Germain-Alamartine E, Ahoba-Sam R, Moghadam-Saman S, Evers G. Doctoral graduates’ transition to industry: networks as a mechanism? Cases from Norway, Sweden and the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 2020;46(12):2680–2695. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1754783
(8) Passaretta G, Trivellato P, Triventi M. Between academia and labour market—the occupational outcomes of PhD graduates in a period of academic reforms and economic crisis. High Educ. 2019;77:541–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0288-4
(9) Stevenson LG. Robert Koch [Internet]. Encyclopedia Britannica; 2024 [updated 2025 Feb. 01st; cited 2025 Jan. 6th. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Robert-Koch.
(10) Worboys M. Thomas D. Brock, Robert Koch: a life in medicine and bacteriology, Berlin, Springer, 1988, 8vo, pp. ix, 364, illus., DM 48.00 (N. American distributor: Science Tech Publishers, Madison WI). Medical History. 1990;34(3):347-348. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025727300052613
(11) Gouveia RH, Gulczynski J, Canzonieri V, Nesi G. Rudolf Virchow: 200th birth anniversary. Virchows Arch. 3032; 479:1063–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03252-w
(12) Coleman W. Rudolf Virchow, Collected essays on public health and epidemiology. Med Hist. 1987;31(1):111–3. https://doi.org10.1017/S0025727300046408
(13) Milewicz DM, Lorenz RG, Dermody TS, Brass LF. National Association of MD-PhD Programs Executive Committee. Rescuing the physician-scientist workforce: the time for action is now. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(10):3742-7. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI84170
(14) Williams CS, Iness AN, Baron RM, Ajijola OA, Hu PJ, Vyas JM, et al. Training the physician-scientist: views from program directors and aspiring young investigators. JCI Insight. 2018;3(23):e125651. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.125651
(15) Strong MJ, Busing N, Goosney DL, Harris KA, Horsley T, Kuzyk A, et al. The Rising Challenge of Training Physician-Scientists: Recommendations From a Canadian National Consensus Conference. Acad Med. 2018;93(2):172-178. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001857
(16) Ghosh-Choudhary S, Carleton N, Nouraie SM, Kliment CR, Steinman RA. Predoctoral MD-PhD grants as indicators of future NIH funding success. JCI Insight. 2022;7(6):e155688. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.155688
(17) Ginsburg D, Mills S, Shurin S, Andrews N, Bernard G, Brass L, et al. Physician-Scientist Workforce Working Group Report. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health; 2014.
(18) Tilghman S, Rockey S, Degen S, Forese L, Ginther D, Gutierrez-Hartmann A, et al. Biomedical Research Workforce Working Group Report. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health; 2012.
(19) Brass LF, Akabas MH, Burnley LD, Engman DM, Wiley CA, Andersen OS. Are MD-PhD programs meeting their goals? An analysis of career choices made by graduates of 24 MD-PhD programs [Internet]. Acad Med. 2010;85(4):692–701. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20186033/
(20) Daye D, Patel CB, Ahn J, Nguyen FT. Challenges and opportunities for reinvigorating the physician-scientist pipeline. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(3):883-7. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI80933
(21) Schwartz DA. Physician-scientists: the bridge between medicine and science. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(6):595-6. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201110-1806ED
(22) Garrison HH, Ley TJ. Physician-scientists in the United States at 2020: Trends and concerns. FASEB J. 2022;36(5):e22253. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202200327
(23) Leigh JP, Tancredi D, Jerant A, Kravitz RL. Physician Wages Across Specialties: Informing the Physician Reimbursement Debate. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(19):1728–1734. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.350
(24) Lakshminrusimha S, Reed AM, Cheng TL, Cunningham JM, Devaskar SU. An Approach to Compensation Plans for Physician Faculty in Academic Pediatric Departments. J Pediatr. 2023;262:113511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113511
(25) Seabury SA, Jena AB, Chandra A. Trends in the Earnings of Health Care Professionals in the United States, 1987-2010. JAMA. 2012;308(20):2083–2085. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.14552
(26) Ganesh K. The joys and challenges of being a physician-scientist. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18(6):365. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-021-00443-3
(27) Permar SR, Ward RA, Barrett KJ, Freel SA, Gbadegesin RA, Kontos CD, et al. Addressing the physician-scientist pipeline: strategies to integrate research into clinical training programs. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(3):1058-1061. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI136181
(28) Gordon R. The vanishing physician scientist: a critical review and analysis. Account Res. 2012;19(2):89-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2012.660076
(29) Glickman MS. Challenges for the MD Physician-Scientist Upon Entering the Lab: From the Grand to the Practical. J Infect Dis. 2018;218(suppl_1):S25-S27. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiy085
(30) Ganetzky RD. Becoming a Physician-Scientist: A View Looking Up From Base Camp. Acad Med. 2017;92(10):1373-1374. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001876
(31) The Editors of Encyclopaedia. Jean-Martin Charcot [Internet]. Encyclopedia Britannica. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jean-Martin-Charcot
(32) Charcot JM. Lectures on the Diseases of the Nervous System. London: New Sydenham Society; 1877.
(33) Kumar DR, Aslinia F, Yale SH, Mazza JJ. Jean-Martin Charcot: the father of neurology. Clin Med Res. 2011;9(1):46-9. https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2009.883
(34) Davila ML, Brentjens RJ. CAR T cell therapy: looking back and looking forward. Nat Cancer. 2022;3(12):1418-1419. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-022-00484-w
(35) Bose R, Ma CX. Breast Cancer, HER2 Mutations, and Overcoming Drug Resistance. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(13):1241-1243. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcibr2110552
(36) Parhiz H, Atochina-Vasserman EN, Weissman D. mRNA-based therapeutics: looking beyond COVID-19 vaccines. Lancet. 2024;403(10432):1192-1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02444-3
(37) William B. The Importance of Translational Research in Practical Applications and Interventions to Improve Healthcare [Internet]. Trans Med. 2023;13:303. Available from: https://www.longdom.org/open-access/the-importance-of-translational-research-in-practical-applications-and-interventions-to-improve-healthcare-103754.html
(38) PLOS Medicine Editors. Translating translational research into global health gains. PLoS Med. 2013;10(7):e1001493. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001493
(39) Rio C, Malani P. Translating Science on COVID-19 to Improve Clinical Care and Support the Public Health Response. JAMA. 2020;323(24):2464–2465. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.9252
(40) Fauci A. On Call: A Doctor's Journey in Public Service. New York: Viking; 2024.
(41) The Nobel Prize. Facts on the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2023 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2023/weissman/facts/
(42) Jha S, Topol EJ. Adapting to Artificial Intelligence: Radiologists and Pathologists as Information Specialists. JAMA. 2016;316(22):2353-2354. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.17438
(43) Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, Alqahtani T, Alshaya AI, Almohareb SN, et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):689. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z
(44) Fiske A, Henningsen P, Buyx A. Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(5):e13216. https://doi.org/10.2196/13216
(45) Luxton DD. Recommendations for the ethical use and design of artificial intelligent care providers. Artif Intell Med. 2014;62(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2014.06.004
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bruno Bezerril Andrade
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyrights, transferring to the Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare only the right of first publication. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
