Evidência de pesquisa Covid-19: uma pesquisa internacional explorando pontos de vista sobre fontes úteis, formatos preferidos e acessibilidade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17267/2675-021Xevidence.2022.e4010Palavras-chave:
Pesquisa, COVID-19, Conhecimento, Percepções, Saúde públicaResumo
INTRODUÇÃO: Em uma pandemia, as partes interessadas, como formuladores de políticas, médicos, pacientes e o público, precisam de acesso a evidências de pesquisa relevantes, oportunas e de alta qualidade em um formato compreensível e aplicável. OBJETIVOS: Uma pesquisa online foi usada para determinar onde um público global encontra evidências de pesquisa sobre o COVID-19 e como eles preferem se manter atualizados. MÉTODOS E MATERIAIS: Realizamos uma pesquisa online com pessoas interessadas em pesquisas em inglês e espanhol. Usamos uma amostra de conveniência de pessoas que visitam sites e contas de mídia social da Cochrane, uma organização internacional que reúne revisões sistemáticas de pesquisas. RESULTADOS: 831 pessoas com várias funções e locais responderam em um curto período com pouca promoção ativa. Profissionais de saúde, membros do público e influenciadores de políticas queriam evidências de pesquisa para informar as decisões sobre o COVID-19. Mais da metade encontrou evidências de pesquisa de sites governamentais (52%), organizações internacionais (57%), periódicos (56%) e organizações de coleta de evidências (60%) úteis. As pessoas queriam evidências de pesquisa sobre formatos COVID-19, como resumos leigos (60%), revisões sistemáticas online (60%), resumos curtos com comentários (51%) e resumos visuais (48%). As pessoas preferiram manter-se atualizadas sobre a pesquisa COVID-19 por meio de atualizações por e-mail e boletins informativos, adaptados aos interesses das pessoas (34%), mídia tradicional (13%) e mídia social (12%). Conclusões: Foi viável coletar feedback rapidamente usando uma simples pesquisa online. Sites de organizações oficiais foram as principais fontes de evidências de pesquisa sobre a COVID-19. Mais pesquisas são necessárias sobre a melhor forma de fornecer evidências de fácil acesso e compreensão.
Downloads
Referências
Cuello-Garcia C, Pérez-Gaxiola G, van Amelsvoort L. Social media can have an impact on how we manage and investigate the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;127:198–201. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jclinepi.2020.06.028
Alanezi F, Aljahdali A, Alyousef S, Alrashed H, Alshaikh W, Mushcab H, et al. Implications of Public Understanding of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia for Fostering Effective Communication Through Awareness Framework. Front Public Health. 2020;8:494. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00494
Li HO-Y, Bailey A, Huynh D, Chan J. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation? BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(5):e002604. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002604
Enders AM, Uscinski JE, Klofstad C, Stoler J. The different forms of COVID-19 misinformation and their consequences. Harv Kennedy Sch Misinformation Rev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-48
Allington D, Duffy B, Wessely S, Dhavan N, Rubin J. Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychol Med. 2020;51(10):1763-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003329172000224x
Hornik R, Kikut A, Jesch E, Woko C, Siegel L, Kim K. Association of COVID-19 misinformation with face mask wearing and social distancing in a nationally representative US sample. Health Commun. 2021;36(1):6–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1847437
Cochrane. Cochrane: About us [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 8]. Available from: https://www.cochrane.org/about-us
Zhao X, Fan J, Basnyat I, Hu B. Online Health Information Seeking Using “# COVID-19 Patient Seeking Help” on Weibo in Wuhan, China: Descriptive Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(10):e22910. https://doi.org/10.2196/22910
Nafees N, Khan D. Health Information Seeking among General Public in India during COVID 19 Outbreak: Exploring Healthcare Practices, Information Needs, Preferred Information Sources and Problems. Libr Philos Pract [Internet]. 2020;1–15. Available from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4307/
Homolak J, Kodvanj I, Virag D. Preliminary analysis of COVID-19 academic information patterns: a call for open science in the times of closed borders. Scientometrics. 2020;124(3):2687–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03587-2
Bazán PR, Azevedo Neto RM, Dias JA, Salvatierra VG, Sanches LG, Lacerda SS, et al. COVID-19 information exposure in digital media and implications for employees in the health care sector: findings from an online survey. Einstein (São Paulo). 2020;18: eAO6127. https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO6127
Ali SH, Foreman J, Tozan Y, Capasso A, Jones AM, DiClemente RJ. Trends and Predictors of COVID-19 Information Sources and Their Relationship With Knowledge and Beliefs Related to the Pandemic: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(4):e21071. https://doi.org/10.2196/21071
Ejaz W, Ittefaq M. Data for understanding trust in varied information sources, use of news media, and perception of misinformation regarding COVID-19 in Pakistan. Data Brief. 2020;32:106091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106091
Fridman I, Lucas N, Henke D, Zigler CK. Association between public knowledge about COVID-19, trust in information sources, and adherence to social distancing: Cross-sectional survey. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(3):e22060. https://doi.org/10.2196/22060
Kalayou MH, Tilahun B, Endehabtu BF, Nurhussien F, Melese T, Guadie HA. Information Seeking on Covid-19 Pandemic: Care Providers’ Experience at the University of Gondar Teaching Hospital, Northwest of Ethiopia. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:1957-64. https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s283563
Zanin GM, Gentile E, Parisi A, Spasiano D. A Preliminary Evaluation of the Public Risk Perception Related to the COVID-19 Health Emergency in Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093024
Parikh PA, Shah BV, Phatak AG, Vadnerkar AC, Uttekar S, Thacker N, et al. COVID-19 pandemic: knowledge and perceptions of the public and healthcare professionals. Cureus. 2020;12(5):e8144. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8144
Zhong Y, Liu W, Lee T-Y, Zhao H, Ji J. Risk perception, knowledge, information sources and emotional states among COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China. Nurs Outlook. 2021;69(1):13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2020.08.005
Ashcraft LE, Quinn DA, Brownson RC. Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01046-3
Chapman E, Haby MM, Toma TS, De Bortoli MC, Illanes E, Oliveros MJ, et al. Knowledge translation strategies for dissemination with a focus on healthcare recipients: an overview of systematic reviews. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-0974-3
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Eve Tomlinson, Debra de Silva, Jana Stojanova, Roses Parker, Muriah Umoquit, Stephanie Lagosky, Bey-Marrié Schmidt, Karen Head
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyrights, transferring to the Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare only the right of first publication. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
