The rhetoric of preprints
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17267/2675-021Xevidence.2021.e3732Palavras-chave:
Preprints. Peer-review. Editorial process. Scientific freedom.Downloads
Referências
Horton R. The rhetoric of research. BMJ. 1995;310(6985):985-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6985.985
Yavchitz A, Ravaud P, Altman DG, Moher D, Hrobjartsson A, Lasserson T, et al. A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:56-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.020
McConnell J, Horton R. Having electronic preprints is logical. BMJ. 1998;316(7148):1907. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136%2Fbmj.316.7148.1907
Delamothe T. Electronic preprints: what should the BMJ do?. BMJ. 1998;316(7134):794-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136%2Fbmj.316.7134.794
Bloom T. Shepherding preprints through a pandemic. BMJ. 2020;371:m4703. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4703
Smyth AR, Rawlinson C, Jenkins G. Preprint servers: a 'rush to publish' or 'just in time delivery' for science?. Thorax. 2020;75(7):532-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-214937
van Schalkwyk MCI, Hird TR, Maani N, Petticrew M, Gilmore AB. The perils of preprints. BMJ. 2020;370:m3111. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3111
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Rafael Leite Pacheco, Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco, Rachel Riera

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyrights, transferring to the Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare only the right of first publication. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.