Non-invasive brain stimulation in craving disorders: evidence-based umbrella review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17267/2965-3738bis.2023.e5296

Keywords:

Non-invasive Brain Stimulation, Neuromodulation, Craving, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of brain stimulation in the control of craving disorders is controversial, mainly in relation to the best target, technique, duration, frequency and parameters. Several meta-analyses have been published, and their data should be summarized to support the best evidence-based clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To provide the best level of evidence for the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in the control of craving disorders. METHODS: Umbrella review registraded on Prospero (CRD42021239577), and conducted according to PRISMA recommendations. The methodological quality and evidence level were assessed through AMSTAR, AMSTAR rank and GRADE. RESULTS: A total of 81 meta-analyses were screened and the final analysis was made on 10 studies including 224 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) enrolling 5,555 patients. The main targets of stimulation were the right, left and bi-hemispheric dorsolateral prefrontal cortices. The studies used anodal tDCS, and high-frequency rTMS. The protocols with the larger effect sizes were anodal tDCS with 2mA, for 30 minutes over the right DLPFC (g=0.45; 95%CI 0.328-0.583; p<0.001), and high-frequency rTMS (10Hz), with 100% of the resting motor threshold, over the left DLPFC (g=1.116; 95%CI 0.597-1.634; p<0.001). The quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate because of inconsistencies mainly due to sample heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: The results of 10 meta-analyses assessing the efficacy of NIBS in the control of craving disorders are robust regarding the effect sizes and provide evidence that bi-hemispheric tDCS and high-frequency rTMS over the DLPFC are effective in the control of craving disorders. However, the evidence level is from low to moderate.

Author Biography

  • Katia Nunes Sá, Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (Salvador). Bahia, Brazil.

    Lattes.cnpq.br/4313045041004715 ORCID - 0000-0002-0255-4379

References

(1) Maiti R, Mishra BR, Hota D. Effect of High-Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Craving in Substance Use Disorder: A Meta-Analysis. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017;29(2):160-71. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.16040065

(2) Shrira I, Aggarwal Y. Drug Overdose Mortality of Residents and Visitors to Cities. Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(10):1273-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2023.2215327

(3) United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World Drug Report 2022 [Internet]. United Nations; 2022. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/data-and-analysis/world-drug-report-2022.html

(4) Murphy PN. Psychobiological Issues in Substance Use and Misuse. London: Routledge; 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429296345

(5) Cooper S, Robison AJ, Mazei-Robison MS. Reward Circuitry in Addiction. Neurotherapeutics. 2017;14(3):687-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0525-z

(6) Lupi M, Martinotti G, Santacroce R, Cinosi E, Carlucci M, Marini S, et al. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review of Scientific Literature. J ECT. 2017;33(3):203-9. https://doi.or/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000401

(7) Zhang JJQ, Fong KNK, Ouyang R-G, Siu AMH, Kranz GS. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on craving and substance consumption in patients with substance dependence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2019;114(12):2137-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14753

(8) Chen J, Qin J, He Q, Zou Z. A Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Substance and Food Craving: What Effect Do Modulators Have?. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:598. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00598

(9) Song S, Zilverstand A, Gui W, Pan X, Zhou X. Reducing craving and consumption in individuals with drug addiction, obesity or overeating through neuromodulation intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its follow-up effects. Addiction. 2022;117(5):1242-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15686

(10) Haass-Koffler CL, Leggio L, Kenna GA. Pharmacological approaches to reducing craving in patients with alcohol use disorders. CNS Drugs. 2014;28(4):343-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-014-0149-3

(11) Tang Z, Zhu Z, Xu J. Psychological Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Individuals With Methamphetamine Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biol Res Nurs. 2023;25(1):117-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004221122522

(12) Wu M-K, Satogami K, Liang C-S, Stubbs B, Carvalho AF, Brunoni AR, et al. Multiple comparison of different noninvasive brain stimulation and pharmacologic interventions in patients with methamphetamine use disorders: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022;76(12):633-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13452

(13) Brunoni AR, Sampaio-Junior B, Moffa AH, Aparício LV, Gordon P, Klein I, et al. Noninvasive brain stimulation in psychiatric disorders: a primer. Braz J Psychiatry. 2019;41(1):70-81. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2017-0018

(14) Jansen JM, Daams JG, Koeter MWJ, Veltman DJ, van den Brink W, Goudriaan AE. Effects of non-invasive neurostimulation on craving: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(10 Part 2):2472-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.009

(15) Ballard IC, Murty VP, Carter RM, MacInnes JJ, Huettel SA, Adcock RA. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex drives mesolimbic dopaminergic regions to initiate motivated behavior. J Neurosci. 2011;31(28):10340-6. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0895-11.2011

(16) Ester T, Kullmann S. Neurobiological regulation of eating behavior: Evidence based on non-invasive brain stimulation. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022;23(4):753-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-021-09697-3

(17) Maatoug R, Bihan K, Duriez P, Podevin P, Silveira-Reis-Brito L, Benyamina A, et al. Non-invasive and invasive brain stimulation in alcohol use disorders: A critical review of selected human evidence and methodological considerations to guide future research. Compr Psychiatry. 2021;109:152257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152257

(18) Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. https://doii.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008

(19) Fregni F, Liguori P, Fecteau S, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Boggio PS. Cortical stimulation of the prefrontal cortex with transcranial direct current stimulation reduces cue-provoked smoking craving: a randomized, sham-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(1):32-40. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v69n0105

(20) Boggio PS, Sultani N, Fecteau S, Merabet L, Mecca T, Pascual-Leone A, et al. Prefrontal cortex modulation using transcranial DC stimulation reduces alcohol craving: a double-blind, sham-controlled study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;92(1-3):55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.06.011

(21) Silva MC, Conti CL, Klauss J, Alves LG, Cavalcante HMN, Fregni F, et al. Behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induced dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plasticity in alcohol dependence. J Physiol Paris. 2013;107(6):493-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2013.07.003

(22) Leong SL, De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Sutherland W, Ross S, Manning P. High definition transcranial pink noise stimulation of anterior cingulate cortex on food craving: An explorative study. Appetite. 2018;120:673-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.10.034

(23) Kass AE, Kolko RP, Wilfley DE. Psychological treatments for eating disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2013;26(6):549-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e328365a30e

(24) Mostafavi S-A, Khaleghi A, Mohammadi MR, Akhondzadeh S. Is transcranial direct current stimulation an effective modality in reducing food craving? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Neurosci. 2020;23(1):55-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2018.1470371

(25) Mishra BR, Nizamie SH, Das B, Praharaj SK. Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in alcohol dependence: a sham-controlled study. Addiction. 2010;105(1):49-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02777.x

(26) Liu Q, Shen Y, Cao X, Li Y, Chen Y, Yang W, et al. Either at left or right, both high and low frequency rTMS of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex decreases cue induced craving for methamphetamine. Am J Addict. 2017;26(8):776-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.12638

(27) Dinur-Klein L, Dannon P, Hadar A, Rosenberg O, Roth Y, Kotler M, et al. Smoking Cessation Induced by Deep Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Prefrontal and Insular Cortices: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;76(9):742-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.05.020

(28) Lefaucheur J-P, Antal A, Ayache SS, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Cogiamanian F, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128(1):56-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087

(29) Sá KN, Baptista RF, Shirahige L, Razza LB, Nogueira M, Coura MHF, et al. Evidence-based umbrella review of non-invasive brain stimulation in anxiety disorders. Eur J Psychiatry. 2023;37(3):167-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpsy.2023.01.001

(30) Masina F, Arcara G, Galletti E, Cinque I, Gamberini L, Mapelli D. Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of conventional and high definition tDCS. Sci Rep. 2021;11:7659. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87371-z

(31) Lefaucheur J-P. Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;160: 559-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64032-1.00037-0

(32) Ceceli AO, Bradberry CW, Goldstein RZ. The neurobiology of drug addiction: cross-species insights into the dysfunction and recovery of the prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47(1):276-91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01153-9

(33) Cerqueira JJ, Almeida OFX, Sousa N. The stressed prefrontal cortex. Left? Right!. Brain Behav Immun. 2008;22:630-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2008.01.005

(34) Kim HJ, Kang N. Bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation attenuated symptoms of alcohol use disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021;108:110160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110160

(35) Schommartz I, Dix A, Passow S, Li S-C. Functional Effects of Bilateral Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulation During Sequential Decision-Making: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study With Offline Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:605190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.605190

(36) Naqvi NH, Gaznick N, Tranel D, Bechara A. The insula: a critical neural substrate for craving and drug seeking under conflict and risk. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;1316(1):53-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12415

(37) Dechantsreiter E, Padberg F, Morash A, Kumpf U, Nguyen A, Menestrina Z, et al. Examining the synergistic effects of a cognitive control video game and a home-based, self-administered non-invasive brain stimulation on alleviating depression: the DiSCoVeR trial protocol. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023;273:85-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-022-01464-y

(38) Miyauchi E, Kawasaki M. Behavioural effects of task-relevant neuromodulation by rTMS on giving-up. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):22250. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01645-0

(39) Ahmed S, Stanciu CN, Kotapati PV, Ahmed R, Bhivandkar S, Khan AM, et al. Effectiveness of Gabapentin in Reducing Cravings and Withdrawal in Alcohol Use Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Review. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2019;21(4):19r02465. https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.19r02465

(40) Cheng Y-C, Huang Y-C, Huang W-L. Gabapentinoids for treatment of alcohol use disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2020;35(6):e2751. https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.2751

(41) Chen C-Y, Chiang Y-C, Kuo T-C, Tam K-W, Loh E-W. Effects of intranasal oxytocin in food intake and craving: A meta-analysis of clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(10):5407-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.08.011

(42) Indave BI, Minozzi S, Pani PP, Amato L. Antipsychotic medications for cocaine dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3:CD006306. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006306.pub3

(43) Minozzi S, Cinquini M, Amato L, Davoli M, Farrell MF, Pani PP, et al. Anticonvulsants for cocaine dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(4):CD006754. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006754.pub4

(44) Rodríguez A, Zavala C. Cannabinoids for the treatment of cannabis abuse disorder. Medwave. 2018;18(6):e7287. https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2018.06.7286

(45) Acheson LS, Williams BH, Farrell M, McKetin R, Ezard N, Siefried KJ. Pharmacological treatment for methamphetamine withdrawal: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023;42(1):7-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13511

(46) Pouliquen M, Auriacombe M. Psychotherapeutic interventions for cannabis use disorder. What do we know and what should we do?. Encephale. 2022;48(1):70-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2021.05.009

(47) Li W, Howard MO, Garland EL, McGovern P, Lazar M. Mindfulness treatment for substance misuse: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;75:62-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2017.01.008

Downloads

Published

10/24/2023

Issue

Section

Reviews

How to Cite

1.
Sá KN, Goulardins JB, Sá MN, Baptista RF, Tanaka C, Shirahige L, et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation in craving disorders: evidence-based umbrella review. Brain Imaging and Stimul. [Internet]. 2023 Oct. 24 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];2:e5296. Available from: https://www5.bahiana.edu.br/index.php/brain/article/view/5296

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2